All recent IELTS questions
    Speaking Part 2Reported 16 July 2026

    Describe a tall building in your city that you like or dislike

    The cue card

    Describe a tall building in your city that you like or dislike.

    How to answer it

    The card offers you like or dislike — choose dislike if you can, because criticism produces sharper language than praise. Describe how it sits against what is around it, since a tall building is mostly interesting in relation to its neighbours, and then give the reason for your verdict.

    What moves the band

    • Architecture lexis: it towers over, glass-fronted, it sticks out, it dwarfs the surrounding streets, an eyesore.
    • The Part 3 disadvantages question wants practical answers: lifts, fire safety, wind, the cost of maintenance.

    Two answers, two bands

    Both answers below respond to this exact question. Read them in order: the difference between them is what a band is actually made of. They are written by us for this page — they are not candidate transcripts.

    Band 6.5

    What a 6.5 sounds like

    I would like to describe a tall building in my city which I like very much. It is a modern business tower in the centre of the city.

    This building is about forty floors high and it is made of glass and steel. It was built about ten years ago and it is one of the tallest buildings in our city. During the day the glass reflects the sun and at night the whole building is illuminated with beautiful lights.

    Inside there are many offices of important companies, and on the ground floor there is a shopping centre with cafes and restaurants. On the top floor there is a restaurant where you can see the whole city, but it is very expensive so I have only been there once.

    I like this building because it is very modern and it shows that our city is developing. It is a symbol of our economic progress and many tourists take photographs of it.

    That is the tall building I wanted to describe.

    Why it scores what it scores: Clear and well sequenced, with reasonable building vocabulary. It stays at 6.5 because it describes the building in isolation — height, materials, what is inside — and the plan points out that a tall building is mostly experienced from the street beside it. Choosing to like it also costs the answer: praise produces modern, beautiful and symbol of progress, where criticism would have produced sharper, more specific language.

    Band 8

    What an 8 sounds like

    I'll take one I dislike, because I've got much more to say about it. There's a residential tower near the old market district — about thirty floors, glass, entirely unremarkable in itself.

    The trouble is where they put it. Everything around it is three or four storeys, brick, built maybe eighty years ago, and it sits in the middle of that like someone standing up in a cinema. From two streets away it looks fine. From directly underneath it's oppressive — it takes the afternoon sun off an entire square that used to be where people sat, and the wind does something strange around the base, so there's a permanent draught on a street that never had one.

    What annoys me most is that it isn't ugly. If it were ugly you could argue about taste. It's a perfectly decent building that would look completely at home somewhere else, and instead it's been dropped into a neighbourhood it has nothing to do with.

    I should be fair to it: people needed those flats and the housing shortage here is real. I just think you can meet that need without putting out the lights in a public square.

    Why it scores what it scores: Taking the dislike option is the strategic choice the plan recommends, and it pays immediately — the language sharpens because the candidate has a real objection to articulate. The building is described through its effect on what surrounds it (light, wind, a square people used) rather than by its own dimensions, and the paragraph distinguishing ugly from wrongly placed is genuine analysis. The concession at the end keeps it from becoming a rant.

    Phrases worth stealing

    • it sits in the middle of that like someone standing up in a cinema
    • it takes the afternoon sun off an entire square that used to be where people sat
    • What annoys me most is that it isn't ugly
    • dropped into a neighbourhood it has nothing to do with
    • without putting out the lights in a public square

    Part 3 questions reported with it

    Part 3 follows the topic of the cue card, so these are the discussion questions the same candidates were asked next.

    • Why do people choose to live in high-rise buildings?
    • Will tall buildings become more common?
    • What are the disadvantages of tall buildings?
    • What types of building are popular in your country?

    These are candidate recalls. These are questions reported by test-takers after their exams, not official or leaked IELTS material. Wording varies by test version, location and memory. Use them for timed practice — never as a prediction of what you will be asked.

    Know the number. Now move it.

    A conversion table tells you where you stand today. Langujet's AI marks your writing and speaking against the real rubric and tells you exactly which criterion is holding your score down.