TOEFL Writing Correction with AI Feedback
Submit a TOEFL Integrated or Writing for an Academic Discussion response and get a correction mapped to the official 0–5 rubric, scaled toward your 0–30 section score. See where you lose points on development, organisation, and language use — and exactly how to fix it.
Built for TOEFL Writing candidates
How TOEFL Writing correction works
Choose your task
Integrated Writing (read, listen, then write) or Writing for an Academic Discussion — the two tasks in the current TOEFL iBT Writing section.
Submit your response
Paste your writing. For the Integrated task you can include the reading and lecture notes so the feedback can check how well you linked the two.
Get a rubric-based score estimate
Your response is evaluated on the criteria TOEFL raters use: development, organisation, and accurate, varied language — reported on the 0–5 rubric and a 0–30 estimate.
Fix and resubmit
A focused list shows what to change — a missing contrast, a weak topic sentence, repeated structures — so your next attempt scores higher.
Feedback that tells you what to fix
A rubric-aligned score estimate
Reported on the official 0–5 Writing rubric and scaled toward a 0–30 section estimate, not an arbitrary percentage.
Integrated-task connection check
Whether you accurately reported the lecture's points and tied each one back to the reading — the core of what the Integrated task scores.
Development and organisation feedback
Whether your ideas are explained and supported or just listed, and whether the response is easy to follow from start to finish.
Language-use corrections
Sentence-level edits for grammar, word choice, and variety — the language quality that separates a 3 from a 4 or 5.
Optional human professor correction
Add a qualified human review for attempts that matter, alongside the AI estimate.
Your professor is teaching a class on urban planning and asks: should cities invest more in public transport or in expanding roads? Two classmates have posted their views. Write a response that contributes to the discussion in 100+ words.
- Development
- You state a clear position (public transport) but support it with one general claim. Add a specific reason — reduced congestion, lower emissions — and a concrete example to reach the top band.
- Engagement with the discussion
- You respond to the professor but ignore both classmates. Referencing one of their points (“Unlike Marco, I think…”) shows you're contributing to a discussion, which the task rewards.
- Organisation
- One dense paragraph. A clear position sentence, a developed reason, then a short concession would make the argument easier to follow.
- Language Use
- Good control overall; “infrastructure” used well. Two slips: “more efficienter” → “more efficient”, and a comma splice that should be two sentences.
The Integrated task is a reading–lecture relationship, not a summary
The most common Integrated Writing mistake is summarising the lecture on its own. The task scores how the lecture responds to the reading — usually by challenging, casting doubt on, or supporting each of its points.
Strong responses pair each lecture point with the reading point it answers. Feedback checks exactly that pairing, so you stop losing marks for a fluent summary that misses the connection the task is built around.
Writing for an Academic Discussion rewards a real contribution
This shorter task asks you to join an online class discussion in 100-plus words. A high score needs a clear, relevant position, a developed reason with a specific example, and a sense that you're engaging with the other voices — not posting in isolation.
Because it's short, every sentence counts. Feedback focuses on whether your contribution is specific and well-reasoned rather than generic, which is where most responses plateau.
Common questions
See where your TOEFL Writing loses points
Submit one response and get a rubric-based correction in minutes — free to start.
Langujet is an independent exam-preparation platform. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to IELTS, the British Council, IDP, Cambridge Assessment English, ETS, or TOEFL. Band and score estimates are guidance to support your practice, not official results.