Cambridge IELTS 12, Test 7, Listening Part 4

    The effects of environmental change on birds: listening answers and explanations

    A lecture on how mercury pollution affects wildlife. The lecturer explains where the mercury comes from, describes Claire Varian-Ramos's research on its effects on birds and their song, and then turns to what it means for humans.

    Questions 31-40 · 10 marks · 1 question block

    How the answers come

    Ten gaps in order. Question 31 comes in the background on mercury; 'a woman called Claire Varian-Ramos' starts the research section (32-36); 'So what are the implications here for humans?' opens the last four.

    Answer key and self-check

    Type what you wrote and hit mark. Hide the key first if you haven't done the part yet. Every question number jumps to its explanation.

    QYour answerAnswer
    Questions 31-40 · Note completion (ONE WORD ONLY)
    31
    insects
    32
    behaviourAlso accepted: behavior
    33
    father
    34
    complexAlso accepted: complicated
    35
    reproductionAlso accepted: breeding
    36
    control
    37
    duckAlso accepted: ducks
    38
    language
    39
    food
    40
    costAlso accepted: costs / price / prices / bill / bills
    Note completion (ONE WORD ONLY)

    Questions 31-40

    How to attack this block: The notes are close to the lecture, but the wording shifts: 'learned from' for 'listening to', 'negative effect' for 'affect their chances'. Several answers come straight after a contrast like 'rather than' or 'but what wasn't known', so stay alert at those points.

    Question 31

    Answer: insectsAfter mercury entering the food chain through fish

    Which birds have recently been found to be affected?

    it's been known for some time that birds which eat fish may be affected, but what wasn't known until quite recently is that those that eat insects can also be affected

    Question says → You hear

    • recently been foundwhat wasn't known until quite recently
    • feed onthose that eat insects

    Why: The new finding, after 'but what wasn't known until quite recently', is about birds that eat insects. Plural: insects.

    The trap: Fish-eating birds are what has been known 'for some time'. The note says 'recently'.

    Question 32

    Answer: behaviourWhen the lecturer introduces Claire Varian-Ramos

    Also accepted: behavior

    Which effect of mercury on birds is Varian-Ramos studying, besides mental processes?

    And these may be to do with the behaviour of the birds, or with the effect of mercury on the way their brain works

    Question says → You hear

    • or mental processesor with the effect of mercury on the way their brain works

    Why: She's looking at the birds' behaviour or the way their brain works. The brain part is the 'mental processes' in the note, so the gap is behaviour (behavior is also accepted).

    The trap: Memory is already in the note as the example. And she isn't counting how many birds are killed, which is ruled out just before.

    Question 33

    Answer: fatherWhen the lecturer explains how song learning happens

    Who do young birds usually learn their song from?

    a young bird seems to acquire this skill by listening to the songs produced by its father, rather than by any other bird

    Question says → You hear

    • learned fromacquire this skill by listening to the songs produced by its father

    Why: Young birds learn by listening to their father's songs. The gap after 'a bird's' needs father.

    The trap: 'Any other bird' is ruled out with 'rather than'. Female birds come later, in a different point.

    Question 34

    Answer: complex'And Varian-Ramos has already found in her research'

    Also accepted: complicated

    How are songs from mercury-exposed birds different?

    the songs they produce aren't as complex as those produced by other birds

    Question says → You hear

    • lessaren't as complex as

    Why: 'Aren't as complex as' becomes 'less ...', so the answer is complex. Complicated is also accepted.

    The trap: Don't write 'simple': 'less simple' says the opposite. The note keeps 'less', so you need the word the speaker used.

    Question 35

    Answer: reproductionStraight after the finding about complex songs

    Also accepted: breeding

    What might the simpler songs harm?

    it can mean that they're less attractive to female birds, and so it can affect their chances of reproduction

    Question says → You hear

    • negative effect on birds'it can affect their chances of reproduction

    Why: Being less attractive to females affects their chances of reproduction. Breeding is also accepted.

    The trap: 'Attractive' or 'attractiveness' is close in meaning but not the final effect the lecturer names.

    Question 36

    Answer: controlWhen the lecturer explains her mix of lab and outdoor studies

    What do lab-based studies give the experimenter more of?

    you don't get all the variables you would in a natural setting, so the experimenter has a much higher level of control

    Question says → You hear

    • allow more ... for the experimenterthe experimenter has a much higher level of control

    Why: With fewer variables, the experimenter has more control. The noun is control.

    The trap: Confidence in the results is mentioned next, but as a consequence of the control. The note says 'for the experimenter', matching 'the experimenter has'.

    Question 37

    Answer: duck'So what are the implications here for humans?'

    Also accepted: ducks

    Which migrating birds containing mercury may be eaten by people?

    it's been found that ducks who'd been feeding at a contaminated site were later shot by hunters over a thousand kilometres away, and presumably eaten

    Question says → You hear

    • may be eaten by humanspresumably eaten

    Why: Ducks fed at a contaminated site, flew a long way and were shot and eaten. Duck or ducks are both accepted.

    The trap: Hunters shoot the birds, but they aren't the answer: the note asks for the type of bird.

    Question 38

    Answer: languageWhen the lecturer goes back to song learning by birds

    What can mercury make it harder for humans to learn?

    in humans, mercury causes developmental delays in the acquisition of language

    Question says → You hear

    • problems in learningdevelopmental delays in the acquisition of language

    Why: 'Acquisition' is learning, and 'developmental delays' are problems. One word: language.

    The trap: Song is the bird equivalent, not the human one.

    Question 39

    Answer: foodWhen the lecturer mentions other important implications for humans

    How does mercury get into a mother's body?

    if the food eaten by its mother contains high

    Question says → You hear

    • Mercury in a mother's body fromthe food eaten by its mother

    Why: A child can be affected if the food its mother eats contains high levels of mercury. The answer is food.

    The trap: Fish appears earlier as how mercury enters the food chain, but here the lecturer uses the general word food.

    Question 40

    Answer: costAt the end, 'It's true there are new regulations'

    Also accepted: costs / price / prices / bill / bills

    What will new emission regulations affect for everyone?

    these will need billions of dollars to implement, and increase costs for everyone

    Question says → You hear

    • will affect everyone's energyincrease costs for everyone

    Why: The regulations will increase costs for everyone. The note already has 'energy', so cost or costs fits (price and bills are also accepted).

    The trap: 'Billions of dollars' is the cost of putting the rules in place, not what changes for everyone.

    The questions most people get wrong

    Question 35

    'Less attractive to female birds' comes first and sounds like the effect. But the gap needs a noun, and the lecturer goes on: it can affect their chances of reproduction.

    Question 40

    'Billions of dollars' is the eye-catching figure, but the note asks what will be affected for everyone. The new rules will 'increase costs for everyone'.

    Question 32

    Two effects are named together: behaviour, and the way the brain works, such as memory. The note already says 'or mental processes', so the gap is the other one, behaviour.

    Words from this recording worth keeping

    toxic(Mercury)
    poisonous
    ingested(Mercury)
    eaten or swallowed
    excreted(Mercury)
    passed out of the body as waste
    subtle(Research on birds)
    small and not easy to notice
    contaminated(Research on birds)
    made dirty or poisonous
    migratory(Implications for humans)
    moving to different places at different seasons
    acquisition(Implications for humans)
    the process of learning or gaining something
    emissions(Implications for humans)
    gases or substances released into the air

    Sit this test on Langujet, then come back

    The full Cambridge 12 Test 7 listening paper with the real audio: all four parts, played once, marked the moment you finish. Already done it? Take it again and listen for the traps this page showed you.

    Take Cambridge 12 Test 7 Listening

    Cambridge IELTS 12, Test 7, Listening Part 4. The recording, transcript and questions belong to Cambridge University Press and are not reproduced here. We quote short extracts of the transcript only as evidence for our own commentary, and the answers are published for self-marking. Get the book for the full material, or sit the test on Langujet.