Cambridge IELTS 11, Test 2, Reading Passage 1

    Raising the Mary Rose: reading answers and analysis

    Henry VIII's warship the Mary Rose sank off Portsmouth in 1545 for reasons still argued over. Fishermen snagged the wreck by chance in 1836, then it was forgotten until Alexander McKee's search in the 1960s and 70s found it again. In 1982 the hull was raised in three careful stages using a lifting frame, jacks and a cushioned cradle.

    Questions 1-13 · 13 marks · 3 question blocks

    Where the answers sit

    The TRUE / FALSE / NOT GIVEN statements (1-4) move from the first paragraph to the fifth. The dates (5-8) are not in passage order. The diagram labels (9-13) are all in the last paragraph, in order.

    Answer key and self-check

    Type what you wrote and hit mark. Hide the key first if you haven't done the passage yet. Every question number jumps to its explanation.

    QYour answerAnswer
    Questions 1-4 · TRUE / FALSE / NOT GIVEN
    1
    TRUE
    2
    NOT GIVEN
    3
    TRUE
    4
    FALSE
    Questions 5-8 · Matching features (dates A-G)
    5
    C
    6
    B
    7
    G
    8
    A
    Questions 9-13 · Diagram labelling (NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS)
    9
    lifting frameAlso accepted: frame
    10
    hydraulic jacks
    11
    stabbing guides
    12
    lifting cradleAlso accepted: cradle
    13
    air bags
    TRUE / FALSE / NOT GIVEN

    Questions 1-4

    How to attack this block: Two of these hang on a single contrast word: 'vary' versus 'undisputed', and 'knew' versus 'unaware'. Read the full sentence each time, because the opening half of each sentence points the wrong way.

    Question 1

    Answer: TRUEParagraph 1, fourth sentence

    Is it uncertain why the Mary Rose sank?

    Accounts of what happened to the ship vary: while witnesses agree that she was not hit by the French, some maintain that she was outdated, overladen and sailing too low in the water, others that she was mishandled

    Question says → Passage says

    • some doubtAccounts of what happened to the ship vary
    • what caused the Mary Rose to sinkoutdated, overladen… mishandled by undisciplined crew

    Why: The witnesses give different explanations: an old, overloaded ship, or a badly run crew. When the accounts 'vary', the cause is in doubt. TRUE.

    The trap: The next sentence says 'What is undisputed' and people grab that. It's the sinking itself that's undisputed, not the reason for it.

    Question 2

    Answer: NOT GIVENParagraph 1

    Was the Mary Rose the only ship that sank in that battle?

    Among the English vessels was a warship by the name of Mary Rose.

    Question says → Passage says

    • the only ship to sinkthe Mary Rose sank into the Solent that day

    Why: The passage only tells you about the Mary Rose. It never says whether other English or French ships went down that day, so NOT GIVEN.

    The trap: Because she's the only ship described as sinking, it's easy to assume she was the only one. Silence about other ships isn't a statement either way.

    Question 3

    Answer: TRUEParagraph 2, fourth sentence

    Did most of one side of the ship survive undamaged on the seabed?

    Because of the way the ship sank, nearly all of the starboard half survived intact.

    Question says → Passage says

    • Most of one sidenearly all of the starboard half
    • lay undamagedsurvived intact

    Why: 'Most' = 'nearly all', 'one side' = 'the starboard half' and 'undamaged' = 'intact'. TRUE.

    The trap: The port side was eroded, which makes some people answer FALSE. The statement only says one side was undamaged, and that's the starboard side.

    Question 4

    Answer: FALSEParagraph 5, second sentence

    Did McKee know beforehand that the wreck held lots of valuable objects?

    McKee and his team now knew for certain that they had found the wreck, but were as yet unaware that it also housed a treasure trove of beautifully preserved artefacts.

    Question says → Passage says

    • knewwere as yet unaware
    • many valuable historical objectsa treasure trove of beautifully preserved artefacts

    Why: The passage says the team did not yet know about the artefacts. 'Knew' against 'unaware' is a direct contradiction, so FALSE.

    The trap: The sentence starts with 'now knew for certain', so a quick reader sees 'knew' and says TRUE. What they knew was that it was the wreck, not what was inside.

    Matching features (dates A-G)

    Questions 5-8

    How to attack this block: Several dates mark a start and an end of the same activity, so decide whether the statement is about beginning, stopping, finding or deciding. Scan for the numbers, then read the verbs around them.

    Question 5

    Answer: CParagraph 4, second and third sentences

    When did a search for the ship begin?

    But in 1965, military historian and amateur diver Alexander McKee, in conjunction with the British Sub-Aqua Club, initiated a project called 'Solent Ships'.

    Question says → Passage says

    • was launchedinitiated a project
    • A search for the Mary Rosewhat McKee really hoped for was to find the Mary Rose

    Why: McKee's 1965 project was officially about several wrecks, but its real goal was finding the Mary Rose. Starting a project = launching a search, so C (1965).

    The trap: 1967 (D) is when sonar found the likely wreck. That's a result of the search, not its start.

    Question 6

    Answer: BParagraph 3, last sentence

    When did one man stop exploring the site?

    Deane continued diving on the site intermittently until 1840

    Question says → Passage says

    • One person's explorationDeane continued diving on the site
    • stoppeduntil 1840

    Why: 'Continued… until 1840' tells you Deane's dives ended in 1840. He's the 'one person', so B.

    The trap: 1836 (A) is when Deane started, not when he stopped.

    Question 7

    Answer: GParagraph 5, last sentence

    When was the decision made to lift the hull?

    the operation was not given the go-ahead until January 1982, when all the necessary information was available

    Question says → Passage says

    • It was agreedgiven the go-ahead
    • the hull… should be raisedto raise the hull if at all feasible

    Why: 'Given the go-ahead' means officially approved, and that happened in January 1982. G.

    The trap: 1979 (F) is when the Trust was formed, and 1978 is when a test dig showed raising might be possible. Neither is the decision.

    Question 8

    Answer: AParagraph 3, first sentence

    When was the wreck discovered by accident?

    some fishermen in the Solent found that their equipment was caught on an underwater obstruction, which turned out to be the Mary Rose

    Question says → Passage says

    • found by chancetheir equipment was caught on an underwater obstruction, which turned out to be

    Why: The fishermen weren't looking for the ship; their gear snagged on it. 'Turned out to be' signals the surprise. That was 1836, so A.

    The trap: 1967 (D) is a find too, but it came from a deliberate sonar search, not chance. Deane also 'happened to be' nearby in 1836, which confirms A.

    Diagram labelling (NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS)

    Questions 9-13

    How to attack this block: Stages one and two of the lift are described step by step in the last paragraph. Leave out numbers ('12') and keep plurals ('guides', 'bags'). A few answers also accept the shorter one-word form.

    Question 9

    Answer: lifting frameParagraph 6, third sentence

    Also accepted: frame

    What was connected to the hull by wires?

    The hull was attached to a lifting frame via a network of bolts and lifting wires.

    Question says → Passage says

    • attached to hull by wiresThe hull was attached to a lifting frame via… lifting wires

    Why: The passage says the hull was attached to the lifting frame; the label flips it round. 'Lifting frame' is two words, and 'frame' alone is also accepted.

    The trap: 'Bolts' are also in the sentence, but they're part of the connection, not the structure on the diagram.

    Question 10

    Answer: hydraulic jacksParagraph 6, fourth sentence

    What stopped the hull being pulled down into the mud?

    The problem of the hull being sucked back downwards into the mud was overcome by using 12 hydraulic jacks.

    Question says → Passage says

    • to prevent hull being sucked into mudThe problem of the hull being sucked back downwards into the mud was overcome

    Why: The problem was overcome by the hydraulic jacks. Leave out the number: '12 hydraulic jacks' is a number plus two words, and the label needs just the thing.

    The trap: 'Lifting frame' also rises in the next sentence, and people put it here. It was the jacks that dealt with the suction.

    Question 11

    Answer: stabbing guidesParagraph 6, near the end

    What were the legs placed into?

    This required precise positioning to locate the legs into the 'stabbing guides' of the lifting cradle.

    Question says → Passage says

    • legs are placed intolocate the legs into

    Why: 'Placed into' = 'locate… into'. The legs go into the 'stabbing guides'. Two words, and keep the plural.

    The trap: 'Lifting cradle' is the next phrase. The guides belong to the cradle, but the legs go into the guides specifically. The cradle is the next answer.

    Question 12

    Answer: lifting cradleParagraph 6, second stage

    Also accepted: cradle

    What was the hull lowered into?

    the hull was lifted completely clear of the seabed and transferred underwater into the lifting cradle

    Question says → Passage says

    • hull is lowered intotransferred underwater into

    Why: In stage two the hull was moved underwater into the lifting cradle. 'Lifting cradle' fits the two-word limit, and 'cradle' alone is also accepted.

    The trap: 'Seabed' is in the same sentence, but the hull is being lifted away from it, not into it.

    Question 13

    Answer: air bagsParagraph 6, near the end

    What gave the hull extra protection?

    was fitted with air bags to provide additional cushioning for the hull's delicate timber framework

    Question says → Passage says

    • extra protectionadditional cushioning
    • for the hullfor the hull's delicate timber framework

    Why: 'Extra' = 'additional' and 'protection' paraphrases 'cushioning'. The things that cushion are air bags. Two words, plural.

    The trap: 'Timber framework' is in the same phrase, but that's what is being protected, not what protects it.

    The questions most people get wrong

    Question 4

    The sentence starts with 'now knew for certain', so people say TRUE. What McKee didn't know yet was that the wreck held a treasure trove.

    Question 7

    1982, when the go-ahead was given. The Trust's founding (1979) and the 1978 test dig come earlier but aren't the decision.

    Question 11

    The legs fit into the 'stabbing guides', which belong to the lifting cradle. Keep the two separate, because the cradle is the next label.

    Words from this passage worth keeping

    overladen(Paragraph 1)
    carrying too heavy a load
    undisputed(Paragraph 1)
    accepted by everyone as true
    degradation(Paragraph 2)
    gradual damage or breaking down
    intermittently(Paragraph 3)
    on and off, not continuously
    faded into obscurity(Paragraph 4)
    was forgotten about
    treasure trove(Paragraph 5)
    a valuable collection of things
    salvage(Paragraph 5)
    rescue a wrecked ship or its contents
    feasible(Paragraph 5)
    possible and practical to do

    Sit this test on Langujet, then come back

    The full Cambridge 11 Test 2 reading paper: all three passages, 60 minutes, marked the second you finish with a review of every answer. Already done it? Take it again and see if the same traps still get you.

    Take Cambridge 11 Test 2 Reading

    Cambridge IELTS 11, Test 2, Reading Passage 1. The passage and questions belong to Cambridge University Press and are not reproduced here. We quote short extracts only as evidence for our own commentary, and the answers are published for self-marking. Get the book for the full text, or sit the test on Langujet.