Cambridge IELTS 11, Test 4, Reading Passage 1

    Research using twins: reading answers and analysis

    Comparing identical and fraternal twins helps scientists separate the effects of genes and environment. Galton suggested the method in 1875, and Bouchard's study of twins raised apart measured heritability. Now epigenetics, chemical reactions that switch genes up or down, is seen as a third factor, which Danielle Reed thinks explains many twin differences.

    Questions 1-13 · 13 marks · 3 question blocks

    Where the answers sit

    The TRUE / FALSE / NOT GIVEN (1-4) jumps from paragraph 1 to paragraph 7. The researcher matching (5-9) uses paragraphs 4, 5 and the last one, with Galton and Bouchard used twice each. The summary (10-13) is in paragraphs 7 and 9.

    Answer key and self-check

    Type what you wrote and hit mark. Hide the key first if you haven't done the passage yet. Every question number jumps to its explanation.

    QYour answerAnswer
    Questions 1-4 · TRUE / FALSE / NOT GIVEN
    1
    FALSE
    2
    NOT GIVEN
    3
    NOT GIVEN
    4
    TRUE
    Questions 5-9 · Matching features (researchers A-C)
    5
    A
    6
    C
    7
    B
    8
    A
    9
    B
    Questions 10-13 · Summary completion (word list A-F)
    10
    D
    11
    B
    12
    E
    13
    F
    TRUE / FALSE / NOT GIVEN

    Questions 1-4

    How to attack this block: Two NOT GIVENs here: one compares twins with non-twins (the passage only compares two kinds of twin), and one asks how Bouchard found his twins. The FALSE hangs on 'must be due to environmental factors'.

    Question 1

    Answer: FALSEParagraph 1, last two sentences

    Could genes explain why one identical twin's skin looks younger than the other's?

    they share virtually the same genetic code. Any differences between them - one twin having younger looking skin, for example - must be due to environmental factors

    Question says → Passage says

    • differences in how young the skin… looksone twin having younger looking skin
    • There may be genetic causesmust be due to environmental factors

    Why: Identical twins share almost the same genes, so the passage says any difference 'must be' environmental, such as time in the sun. Genetic causes are ruled out. FALSE.

    The trap: 'Virtually' (almost) makes some people think a tiny genetic cause is still possible, so they choose NOT GIVEN. But 'must be due to environmental factors' is a firm contradiction.

    Question 2

    Answer: NOT GIVENParagraph 2, last sentence

    Are twins more likely than non-twins to get certain diseases?

    If identical twins are more similar to each other with respect to an ailment than fraternal twins are, then vulnerability to the disease must be rooted at least in part in heredity.

    Question says → Passage says

    • at greater risk of developing certain illnessesvulnerability to the disease

    Why: The passage compares identical twins with fraternal twins to measure how much disease risk is inherited. It never compares twins with non-twins. NOT GIVEN.

    The trap: 'Vulnerability to disease' and 'more similar' sound like a higher risk for twins. The comparison is between two kinds of twin, not twins and everyone else.

    Question 3

    Answer: NOT GIVENParagraph 4, second half

    Did Bouchard put adverts in newspapers to find separated twins?

    Over two decades 137 sets of twins eventually visited Thomas Bouchard's lab in what became known as the Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart.

    Question says → Passage says

    • twins who had been separated at birthidentical twins who had been separated at birth and reunited as adults

    Why: You learn how many twins came and how many questions they answered, but not how Bouchard found them. NOT GIVEN.

    The trap: If you know the real story of the Minnesota study, you might answer TRUE. Only the passage counts, and it says nothing about adverts.

    Question 4

    Answer: TRUEParagraph 7, first sentence

    Are epigenetic processes separate from both genes and environment?

    Epigenetic processes are chemical reactions tied to neither nature nor nurture but representing what researchers have called a 'third component'.

    Question says → Passage says

    • different from both genetic and environmental processestied to neither nature nor nurture
    • differenta 'third component' / a third factor also in play

    Why: Nature = genes and nurture = environment, as paragraph 1 sets up. 'Tied to neither' and 'third component' mean epigenetics is distinct from both. TRUE.

    The trap: Paragraph 6 says epigenetics can act 'as a bridge between the environment and our genes', which makes some people think it isn't separate. A bridge between two things is still a third thing.

    Matching features (researchers A-C)

    Questions 5-9

    How to attack this block: Galton and Bouchard each answer twice, so expect repeats. Separate who suggested the twin method (1875) from who carried out the big study of separated twins. Reed is the one who looks ahead to epigenetics.

    Question 5

    Answer: AParagraph 4, first sentence

    Who created a phrase that separates two influences on our characteristics?

    when the English scientist Francis Galton first suggested the approach (and coined the phrase 'nature and nurture')

    Question says → Passage says

    • invented a termcoined the phrase
    • two factors affecting human characteristics'nature and nurture'

    Why: 'Coined' means invented a new word or phrase. 'Nature and nurture' names the two factors, genes and environment. A.

    The trap: Reed uses the pencil-and-pen image, which also contrasts two things, but she didn't invent a term.

    Question 6

    Answer: CLast paragraph, first sentence

    Who says epigenetics will help us understand more?

    Reed adds, the latest work in epigenetics promises to take our understanding even further

    Question says → Passage says

    • expressed the viewReed adds
    • will increase our knowledgepromises to take our understanding even further / it's sort of a whole new world

    Why: 'Take our understanding even further' = 'increase our knowledge'. Reed says it, so C.

    The trap: Bouchard's work led to today's interest in twins, but the passage never links him to epigenetics.

    Question 7

    Answer: BParagraph 5, first two sentences

    Who is linked to a statistical way of measuring genetic influence?

    Bouchard and his colleagues used this mountain of data to identify how far twins were affected by their genetic makeup. The key to their approach was a statistical concept called heritability.

    Question says → Passage says

    • a mathematical methoda statistical concept called heritability
    • measuring genetic influencesidentify how far twins were affected by their genetic makeup

    Why: 'Mathematical method' paraphrases 'statistical concept', and heritability measures how far genes explain differences. That approach belongs to Bouchard's team, so B.

    The trap: Galton (A) suggested using twins to 'measure the influence of heredity', which sounds like the same thing. He proposed the idea; the statistical method is Bouchard's.

    Question 8

    Answer: AParagraph 4, first sentence

    Who first did genetic research with twins?

    The idea of using twins to measure the influence of heredity dates back to 1875, when the English scientist Francis Galton first suggested the approach

    Question says → Passage says

    • pioneeredfirst suggested / dates back to 1875
    • research into genetics using twinsusing twins to measure the influence of heredity

    Why: Galton was the first to propose twin studies, back in 1875. Being first = pioneering. A.

    The trap: Reed calls Bouchard 'the trailblazer', which means pioneer. But she means he triggered today's surge in twin studies, not that he started them. Galton came over a century earlier.

    Question 9

    Answer: BParagraph 4, second half

    Who studied twins who grew up separately?

    the Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart

    Question says → Passage says

    • twins who had lived apartTwins Reared Apart / separated at birth and reunited as adults
    • carried out researchvisited Thomas Bouchard's lab

    Why: The separated twins visited Bouchard's lab for the Minnesota study. 'Reared apart' = 'lived apart'. B, which is allowed to repeat.

    The trap: Reed has worked with many twins too, but nothing says hers were raised apart.

    Summary completion (word list A-F)

    Questions 10-13

    How to attack this block: The box words are close paraphrases of the passage: chemical reactions, body parts, the environment, behavioural problems. 'Nurture' and 'code' are the decoys, because both appear nearby in the passage with a different role.

    Question 10

    Answer: DParagraph 7

    What, in epigenetic processes, affects how our genes work?

    Epigenetic processes are chemical reactions… These reactions influence how our genetic code is expressed

    Question says → Passage says

    • influence the activity of our genesinfluence how our genetic code is expressed
    • chemicalschemical reactions

    Why: The processes are 'chemical reactions' that influence how genes are expressed. 'Chemicals' (D) is the box word for them.

    The trap: 'Code' (C) is from 'genetic code', but that's what gets influenced, not what does the influencing. The verb 'influence' needs a plural subject, and 'code' is singular.

    Question 11

    Answer: BParagraph 7, last sentence

    What internal parts of the body are built through gene activity?

    to build our bones, brains and all the other parts of our bodies

    Question says → Passage says

    • creatingto build
    • our internal organsbones, brains and all the other parts of our bodies / heart, brain, or liver cells

    Why: Bones, brains and other body parts are things inside us. 'Internal organs' is the natural phrase, so B.

    The trap: 'Code' (C) also follows 'our' nicely ('our internal code'), but the passage's example is about building physical body parts, not a code.

    Question 12

    Answer: EParagraph 9, first sentence

    What can affect our genes, according to new epigenetic research?

    revealing a mechanism by which the environment directly impacts on genes

    Question says → Passage says

    • uncovering a wayrevealing a mechanism
    • our genes can be affected bydirectly impacts on genes

    Why: 'Uncovering a way' = 'revealing a mechanism', and the thing that impacts the genes is the environment. E.

    The trap: 'Nurture' (A) means much the same as environment, which makes it a strong distractor. But the passage says 'environment' in this sentence, and 'nurture' would also clash with paragraph 7, where epigenetics is 'tied to neither nature nor nurture'.

    Question 13

    Answer: FParagraph 9, second sentence

    What can go wrong as a rat grows up if its mother was stressed in pregnancy?

    when a rat experiences stress during pregnancy, it can cause epigenetic changes in a fetus that lead to behavioral problems as the rodent grows up

    Question says → Passage says

    • if a pregnant rat suffers stresswhen a rat experiences stress during pregnancy
    • may later show problems in itslead to behavioral problems as the rodent grows up

    Why: 'Behavioral problems' becomes 'problems in its behaviour'. F.

    The trap: 'Organs' (B) might seem possible for a developing fetus, but the passage only names behaviour.

    The questions most people get wrong

    Question 8

    Galton, not Bouchard. Reed calls Bouchard 'the trailblazer', but Galton first suggested using twins, back in 1875.

    Question 1

    FALSE, not NOT GIVEN. Identical twins share virtually all their genes, so any skin difference 'must be' environmental.

    Question 12

    'Environment' (E), not 'nurture' (A). The passage says the environment directly affects genes, and calls epigenetics separate from nurture.

    Words from this passage worth keeping

    untangle(Paragraph 1)
    separate out things that are mixed together
    quantify(Paragraph 2)
    measure as an amount
    heredity(Paragraph 2)
    passing of traits from parents to children through genes
    pinpoint(Paragraph 3)
    identify exactly
    interplay(Paragraph 3)
    the way two things affect each other
    coined(Paragraph 4)
    invented a new word or phrase
    hardwired(Paragraph 10)
    fixed from birth and not able to change
    trailblazer(Paragraph 11)
    the first person to do something new

    Sit this test on Langujet, then come back

    The full Cambridge 11 Test 4 reading paper: all three passages, 60 minutes, marked the second you finish with a review of every answer. Already done it? Take it again and see if the same traps still get you.

    Take Cambridge 11 Test 4 Reading

    Cambridge IELTS 11, Test 4, Reading Passage 1. The passage and questions belong to Cambridge University Press and are not reproduced here. We quote short extracts only as evidence for our own commentary, and the answers are published for self-marking. Get the book for the full text, or sit the test on Langujet.