Cambridge IELTS 13, Test 2, Reading Passage 1

    Bringing cinnamon to Europe: reading answers and analysis

    Cinnamon was used in biblical times, ancient Rome and medieval Europe, where it showed off wealth. Arab merchants carried it overland to Alexandria and Venice controlled its sale. Then the Portuguese, Dutch and English each seized Ceylon's cinnamon trade in turn, until wider cultivation and new trades in coffee, tea and sugar ended its importance.

    Questions 1-13 · 13 marks · 2 question blocks

    Where the answers sit

    The notes (1-9) are all in Paragraphs 1 and 2, in order: uses first, then the route from India to Venice. The TRUE / FALSE / NOT GIVEN statements (10-13) move through Paragraphs 3 to 6, one European power at a time.

    Answer key and self-check

    Type what you wrote and hit mark. Hide the key first if you haven't done the passage yet. Every question number jumps to its explanation.

    QYour answerAnswer
    Questions 1-9 · Note completion (ONE WORD ONLY)
    1
    oils
    2
    friendship
    3
    funerals
    4
    wealth
    5
    indigestion
    6
    India
    7
    camels
    8
    Alexandria
    9
    Venice
    Questions 10-13 · TRUE / FALSE / NOT GIVEN
    10
    TRUE
    11
    FALSE
    12
    NOT GIVEN
    13
    FALSE
    Note completion (ONE WORD ONLY)

    Questions 1-9

    How to attack this block: The note headings are time periods, so you know which sentences to read. The first five gaps are about uses (an ingredient, a feeling, an event, a status, an illness), and the last four trace the trade route. Capital letters matter for the place names.

    Question 1

    Answer: oilsParagraph 1, second sentence

    In biblical times, what was cinnamon mixed into?

    both as an ingredient that was mixed with oils for anointing people's bodies

    Question says → Passage says

    • added toan ingredient that was mixed with

    Why: 'Added to' matches 'an ingredient… mixed with', and what it was mixed with is 'oils'. Keep the plural: the passage says 'oils'.

    The trap: 'Bodies' is the end of the phrase, but the oil went on bodies. Cinnamon was added to the oils, not to people.

    Question 2

    Answer: friendshipParagraph 1, second sentence

    What did cinnamon show between people in biblical times?

    and also as a token indicating friendship among lovers and friends

    Question says → Passage says

    • used to showa token indicating
    • between peopleamong lovers and friends

    Why: 'Show' is 'indicating', and 'between people' is 'among lovers and friends'. The noun after 'indicating' is 'friendship'.

    The trap: 'Lovers' or 'friends' are the people, not what was shown. The gap needs the feeling, 'friendship'.

    Question 3

    Answer: funeralsParagraph 1, third sentence

    Where in ancient Rome was cinnamon burnt for its smell?

    In ancient Rome, mourners attending funerals burnt cinnamon to create a pleasant scent.

    Question says → Passage says

    • its sweet smella pleasant scent
    • atattending

    Why: 'Sweet smell' is 'pleasant scent', and the event in the sentence is 'funerals'. 'At funerals' reads naturally; keep the plural.

    The trap: 'Mourners' is the other noun here, but they're the people at the event. 'Used… at mourners' doesn't make sense.

    Question 4

    Answer: wealthParagraph 1, sixth sentence

    What did cinnamon say about a person in the Middle Ages?

    a host would offer guests a plate with various spices piled upon it as a sign of the wealth at his or her disposal

    Question says → Passage says

    • was an indication ofas a sign of
    • a person'shis or her

    Why: 'An indication of' is 'a sign of', and what the spices showed was the host's 'wealth'. The sentence before backs it up: people showed off that they could afford an expensive spice.

    The trap: 'Ability' (to purchase) is the nearby idea, but 'a person's ability' is incomplete without 'to purchase'. One word that fits: 'wealth'.

    Question 5

    Answer: indigestionParagraph 1, last sentence

    Which health problem was cinnamon said to treat?

    Cinnamon was also reported to have health benefits, and was thought to cure various ailments, such as indigestion.

    Question says → Passage says

    • known as a treatment forwas thought to cure
    • and other health problemsvarious ailments, such as

    Why: 'Treatment for' matches 'cure', and 'such as' gives the one named ailment: 'indigestion'. Check the spelling; it's an easy word to lose marks on.

    The trap: 'Ailments' is the general word, and the note already says 'other health problems'. The gap wants the specific example.

    Question 6

    Answer: IndiaParagraph 2, fourth sentence

    Where was the cinnamon grown?

    They took it from India, where it was grown, on camels via an overland route to the Mediterranean.

    Question says → Passage says

    • grown inwhere it was grown

    Why: The passage says it straight: 'India, where it was grown'. Use a capital letter.

    The trap: Ceylon is where the Portuguese found it later, in Paragraph 3. The notes here are still about the Middle Ages, when Arab merchants brought it from India.

    Question 7

    Answer: camelsParagraph 2, fourth sentence

    How did the merchants carry cinnamon to the Mediterranean?

    They took it from India, where it was grown, on camels via an overland route to the Mediterranean.

    Question says → Passage says

    • merchants usedArab merchants… took it… on camels
    • to bring it to the Mediterraneanvia an overland route to the Mediterranean

    Why: The note asks what they 'used', which is the means of transport: 'camels'. Plural, as in the passage.

    The trap: 'Route' is in the same sentence, but you travel along a route rather than use it to bring something. And 'overland route' is two words.

    Question 8

    Answer: AlexandriaParagraph 2, fifth sentence

    Where did cinnamon arrive in the Mediterranean?

    Their journey ended when they reached Alexandria.

    Question says → Passage says

    • arrived in the Mediterranean atTheir journey ended when they reached

    Why: The camel journey ended at 'Alexandria', which is where the cinnamon arrived. Copy the spelling exactly, with a capital.

    The trap: Venice comes next and is also a Mediterranean city, but that's where European traders took it afterwards, which is the next note.

    Question 9

    Answer: VeniceParagraph 2, sixth and seventh sentences

    Which city did traders take cinnamon to before it went round Europe?

    European traders sailed there to purchase their supply of cinnamon, then brought it back to Venice. The spice then travelled from that great trading city to markets all around Europe.

    Question says → Passage says

    • traders took it toEuropean traders… brought it back to
    • sold it to destinations around Europetravelled from that great trading city to markets all around Europe

    Why: The traders bought it in Alexandria and brought it to 'Venice', and from that trading city it went to markets across Europe.

    The trap: 'Europe' is the end of the sentence, but the note already says 'destinations around Europe'. The gap is the city in between.

    TRUE / FALSE / NOT GIVEN

    Questions 10-13

    How to attack this block: These are about dates and control, so put the years in order. The Portuguese held the trade for about 150 years, the Dutch took decades to push them out, and by the 1800s the spice trade was fading. The NOT GIVEN compares planted and wild trees, which the passage never does.

    Question 10

    Answer: TRUEParagraph 3 and Paragraph 4

    Did the Portuguese control Ceylon's cinnamon trade all through the 1500s?

    In 1518, the Portuguese built a fort on Ceylon, which enabled them to protect the island, so helping them to develop a monopoly … By 1640, the Dutch broke the 150-year Portuguese monopoly

    Question says → Passage says

    • had control over the cinnamon tradedevelop a monopoly in the cinnamon trade / the 150-year Portuguese monopoly
    • throughout the 16th centurytoward the end of the 15th century / In the late 16th century

    Why: TRUE. The Portuguese arrived at the end of the 1400s, built their fort in 1518, still had big profits in the late 1500s, and only lost the monopoly by 1640. A 150-year monopoly covers the whole 16th century.

    The trap: Some people pick NOT GIVEN because no sentence says 'throughout the 16th century'. You have to put the dates together: arrival, fort, late-16th-century profits, then 1640.

    Question 11

    Answer: FALSEParagraph 4

    Did the Dutch take over the trade straight after arriving?

    When the Dutch arrived off the coast of southern Asia at the very beginning of the 17th century … By 1640, the Dutch broke the 150-year Portuguese monopoly

    Question says → Passage says

    • as soon as they arrivedat the very beginning of the 17th century
    • took over the cinnamon tradebroke the 150-year Portuguese monopoly / gaining control of the lucrative cinnamon trade

    Why: FALSE. They arrived around 1600, first allied with Kandy, broke the monopoly by 1640 and only expelled the Portuguese in 1658. That's decades, not 'as soon as'.

    The trap: 'Set their sights on displacing the Portuguese' shows they wanted it from the start. Wanting it isn't having it.

    Question 12

    Answer: NOT GIVENParagraph 5, last sentence

    Did the Dutch-planted trees produce more cinnamon than wild ones?

    Eventually, the Dutch began cultivating their own cinnamon trees to supplement the diminishing number of wild trees available for use.

    Question says → Passage says

    • The trees planted by the Dutchcultivating their own cinnamon trees
    • the wild treeswild trees available for use

    Why: NOT GIVEN. The Dutch planted trees because wild ones were running out. Nothing compares how much cinnamon each kind produced.

    The trap: 'Supplement' and 'boost production' make it sound as if the new trees were more productive. They added to supply; the passage never says they yielded more per tree.

    Question 13

    Answer: FALSEParagraph 6, last sentence

    Did the spice trade stay economically important through the 1800s?

    the spice trade overall was diminishing in economic potential, and was eventually superseded by the rise of trade in coffee, tea, chocolate, and sugar

    Question says → Passage says

    • maintained its economic importancewas diminishing in economic potential / eventually superseded

    Why: FALSE. By the mid-19th century the spice trade was 'diminishing in economic potential' and was later replaced by trade in coffee, tea, chocolate and sugar. 'Maintained' is the opposite.

    The trap: Production reached 1,000 tons a year in the same paragraph, which sounds like success. More cinnamon didn't stop the trade losing its value.

    The questions most people get wrong

    Question 10

    TRUE. There's no single sentence. Combine the arrival at the end of the 15th century, the 1518 fort, late-16th-century profits and the 150-year monopoly broken by 1640.

    Question 12

    NOT GIVEN. The Dutch planted trees because wild ones were running out. Nothing compares how much each kind produced.

    Question 4

    'Wealth'. The banquet spices were a sign of the wealth at the host's disposal. 'Ability' is nearby but needs more words.

    Words from this passage worth keeping

    anointing(Paragraph 1)
    putting oil on someone, often as a ritual
    ailments(Paragraph 1)
    minor illnesses
    condiment(Paragraph 1)
    something added to food for flavour
    exorbitantly(Paragraph 2)
    far too much, especially of a price
    spurred(Paragraph 2)
    encouraged or pushed into action
    pliable(Paragraph 3)
    easy to bend
    lucrative(Paragraph 4)
    making a lot of money
    superseded(Paragraph 6)
    replaced by something newer

    Sit this test on Langujet, then come back

    The full Cambridge 13 Test 2 reading paper: all three passages, 60 minutes, marked the second you finish with a review of every answer. Already done it? Take it again and see if the same traps still get you.

    Take Cambridge 13 Test 2 Reading

    Cambridge IELTS 13, Test 2, Reading Passage 1. The passage and questions belong to Cambridge University Press and are not reproduced here. We quote short extracts only as evidence for our own commentary, and the answers are published for self-marking. Get the book for the full text, or sit the test on Langujet.